{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Acute Kidney Injury","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.thinkkidneys.nhs.uk\/aki","author_name":"julieslevin","title":"The Evaluation of the AKI Programme \u2013 A personal perspective from Ron Cullen - Acute Kidney Injury","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"mMOOAsEEaa\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thinkkidneys.nhs.uk\/aki\/blog\/evaluation-aki-programme-personal-perspective-ron-cullen\/\">The Evaluation of the AKI Programme \u2013 A personal perspective from Ron Cullen<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thinkkidneys.nhs.uk\/aki\/blog\/evaluation-aki-programme-personal-perspective-ron-cullen\/embed\/#?secret=mMOOAsEEaa\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;The Evaluation of the AKI Programme \u2013 A personal perspective from Ron Cullen&#8221; &#8212; Acute Kidney Injury\" data-secret=\"mMOOAsEEaa\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"The evaluation of any national quality improvement programme has always proved difficult as it&#8217;s challenging to separate out what was emergent change that would have happened anyway, compared to the improvements that were a direct result of the programme. This requires using improvement science techniques based on trials methodologies. It is doubly difficult when the programme had an evolving nature to meet the demands of the..."}